Publications

2024

• Guadamuz, A. (2024). The EU’s artificial intelligence act and copyright. Journal of World Intellectual Property, pages. doi:10.1111/jwip.12330
  Article. View on figshare.
• Bakir, V., Bennet, K., Bland, B., Laffer, A., Li, P., & McStay, A. (2024). When is deception OK? Developing the IEEE recommended practice for ethical considerations of emulated empathy in partner-based general-purpose artificial intelligence systems (IEEE P7014.1). In 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) (pp. 1-6). Puebla, Mexico: IEEE. doi:10.1109/istas61960.2024.10732349
  Conference publication. View on figshare.
• Shurson, J. (2024). A European right to end-to-end encryption?. Computer Law and Security Review, pages. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106063
  Article. View on figshare.
• Barclay, S., Barnett, S., Moore, M., & Townend, J. (2024). Local news as political institution and the repercussions of ‘news deserts’: a qualitative study of seven UK local areas. Journalism, pages. doi:10.1177/14648849241272255
  Article. View on figshare.
• Pettersson, A. B. V., Ballardini, R. M., Mimler, M., Li, P., Salmi, M., Minssen, T., . . . Mäkitie, A. (2024). Core legal challenges for medical 3D printing in the EU. Healthcare (Switzerland), 12(11), pages. doi:10.3390/healthcare12111114
  Article. View on figshare.
• Guadamuz, A. (2024). Epilogue. NFTs, Creativity and the Law: Within and Beyond Copyright, 263-264. doi:10.4324/9781003395508-15
  Article. View online.

2023

• Townend, J., & Welsh, L. (2023). Observing justice: digital transparency, openness and accountability in criminal courts. Bristol University Press.
  Book. View on figshare.
• Li, P., Williams, R., Stephen, G., & Stuart, A. (2023). Regulating artificial intelligence and machine learning-enabled medical devices in Europe and the United Kingdom. Law, Technology and Humans, 5(2), 94-113. doi:10.5204/lthj.3073
  Article. View on figshare.
• Shurson, J. (2023). Law Enforcement Access to Encrypted Data Across Borders. In M. Ó Floinn, L. Farmer, J. Hörnle, & D. Ormerod (Eds.), Transformations in Criminal Jurisdiction: Extraterritoriality and Enforcement. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  Chapter.
• Li, P., Williams, R., Gilbert, S., & Anderson, S. (2023). Regulating AI/ML-enabled Medical Devices in the UK. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. doi:10.1145/3597512.3599704
  Conference publication. View online.
• Gilbert, S., Anderson, S., Daumer, M., Li, P., Melvin, T., & Williams, R. (2023). Learning from experience and finding the right balance in the governance of ai-based and digital health technologies: a perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, 1-11. doi:10.2196/43682
  Article. View on figshare.
• Pettersson, A., Ballardini, R. M., Mimler, M., Li, P., Salmi, M., Minssen, T., . . . Mäkitie, A. (2023). Legal issues and underexplored data protection in medical 3D printing: a scoping review. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11, 1-8. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1102780
  Article. View on figshare.
• Guadamuz, A. (n.d.). These Are Not the Apes You Are Looking For. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4360484
  Preprint. View online.
• Guadamuz, A. (n.d.). A Scanner Darkly: Copyright Infringement in Artificial Intelligence Inputs and Outputs. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4371204
  Preprint. View online.

2022

• Barnett, S., Murdoch, T., & Townend, J. (2022). Where public interest and public benefit meet: the application of charity law to journalism. The Journal of Media Law, 1-29. doi:10.1080/17577632.2022.2141225
  Article. View on figshare.
• Gilbert, S., Anderson, S., Daumer, M., Li, P., Melvin, T., & Williams, R. (2022). Learning From Experience and Finding the Right Balance in the Governance of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health Technologies (Preprint). doi:10.2196/preprints.43682
  Preprint. View online.
• Bicudo, E., Morrison, M., Li, P., Faulkner, A., Mourby, M., & Kaye, J. (2022). Patent power in biomedical innovation: technology governance in biomodifying technologies. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 1-22. doi:10.1111/jwip.12237
  Article. View on figshare.
• Lim, P. H., & Li, P. (2022). Patentability of biofabricated human organs: ‘products of nature’ or ‘products derived from nature’ revisited. In Patenting Biotechnical Innovation: Eligibility, Ethics and Public Interest (pp. 69-89). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• Lim, P. H., & Li, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and inventorship: patently much ado in the computer program. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, pages. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpac019
  Article. View on figshare.
• Morita-Jaeger, M., & Winters, L. A. (2022). Trade. In A. Menon, J. Reland, & J. Rutter (Eds.), Doing Things Differently? Policy After Brexit. UK in a Changing Europe. Retrieved from https://ukandeu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/UKICE-Policy-Report_FINAL.pdf
  Chapter.
• Mourby, M., Morrison, M., Li, P., Faulkner, A., Bicudo, E., Bell, J., & Kaye, J. (2022). Biomodifying the ‘Natural’: from adaptive regulation to adaptive societal governance. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 9(1), pages. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsac018
  Article. View on figshare.
• Cantner, U., Verspagen, B., Lazaric, N., Savona, M., Fontana, R., Joosten, R., . . . Vannuccini, S. (2022). Editorial. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 32(1). doi:10.1007/s00191-022-00764-9
  Article. View online.

2021

• Guadamuz, A. (2021). The treachery of images: non-fungible tokens and copyright. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1-19. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpab152
  Article. View on figshare.
• Townend, J., & Magrath, P. (2022). Remote trial and error: how COVID-19 changed public access to court proceedings. Journal of Media Law, 13(2), 107-121. doi:10.1080/17577632.2021.1979844
  Article. View on figshare.
• Mahalatchimy, A., Lau, P. L., Li, P., & Flear, M. L. (2021). Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginary. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 8(2), 1-30. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa080
  Article. View on figshare.
• Townend, J., & Wiener, C. (2021). ‘Justice system data’: a comparative study. Surrey: The Legal Education Foundation.
  Reports and working papers. View on figshare.
• Bicudo, E., Faulkner, A., & Li, P. (2021). Sociotechnical alignment in biomedicine: the 3D bioprinting market beyond technology convergence. Technology in Society, 66, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101668
  Article. View on figshare.
• Gervais, D. J. (Ed.) (2021). The Future of Intellectual Property. Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781800885349
  Book. View online.
• Li, P. (2021). Intellectual property for humanity: a manifesto. In The future of intellectual property (pp. 9-36). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781800885349
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• Guadamuz, A. (2021). Do androids dream of electric copyright? Comparative analysis of originality in artificial intelligence generated works. In Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property (pp. 147-176). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198870944.003.0008
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• Bicudo, E., Faulkner, A., & Li, P. (2021). Digital readiness in 3D bioprinting: software, governance and hospitals’ proto-clinical interfaces. Regenerative Medicine, 16(3), pages. doi:10.2217/rme-2020-0132
  Article. View on figshare.
• Shurson, J. (2021). Sovereignty, RIP. MODERN LAW REVIEW, 84(2). doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12586
  Article. View online.
• Shurson, J., Gillispie, A., & Mason, S. (2021). Encrypted data. In S. Mason, & D. Seng (Eds.), Electronic Evidence (Fifth Edition ed.). University of London Press.
  Chapter.

2020

• Bicudo, E., Faulkner, A., & Li, P. (2020). Software, risks, and liabilities: ongoing and emergent issues in 3D bioprinting. Journal of Risk Research, 1-15. doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1848904
  Article. View on figshare.
• Bicudo, E., Faulkner, A., & Li, P. (2020). Patents and the experimental space: social, legal, and geographical dimensions of 3D bioprinting. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 1-22. doi:10.1080/13600869.2020.1785066
  Article. View on figshare.
• Guadamuz, A. (2020). Smart contracts, blockchain and intellectual property: challenges and reality. In Intellectual property and the 4th industrial revolution (pp. pages). Amsterdam: Kluwer International Law.
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• Guadamuz, A. (2020). Living in a remixed world: comparative analysis of transformative uses in copyright law. In Future law: emerging technology, regulation and ethics (pp. 408.0 pages). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• Li, P., Faulkner, A., & Medcalf, N. (2020). 3D bioprinting in a 2D regulatory landscape: gaps, uncertainties, and problems. Law, Innovation and Technology, 12(1), 1-29. doi:10.1080/17579961.2020.1727054
  Article. View on figshare.
• Shurson, J. (2020). Data protection and law enforcement access to digital evidence: resolving the reciprocal conflicts between EU and US law. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 28(2), 167-184. doi:10.1093/ijlit/eaaa011
  Article. View online.

2019

• Guadamuz, A. (2019). All watched over by machines of loving grace: a critical look at smart contracts. Computer Law and Security Review, 35(6), 1-29. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105338
  Article. View on figshare.

2018

• Guadamuz, A. (2018). Internet regulation. In Law, policy and the internet (pp. 480.0 pages). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• Guadamuz, A. (2018). Open approaches to sharing: registered and unregistered rights. doi:10.4337/9781786431172.00021
  Article. View online.
• Leon, N., Baumel-Schwartz, J., Paz-Fuchs, A., & Kreitner, R. (2018). Book Reviews. Israel Studies Review, 33(1). doi:10.3167/isr.2018.330108
  Article. View online.

2017

• Guadamuz, A. (2017). Developing a right to be forgotten. In EU Internet Law: Internet Law Regulation and Enforcement (pp. 59-76). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2017). 3D bioprinting: regulation, innovation, and patents. In 3D bioprinting for reconstructive surgery: techniques and applications (pp. 570.0 pages). Elsevier.
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• Li, P., & Faulkner, A. (2017). 3D bioprinting regulations: a UK/EU perspective. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 8(2), 441-447. doi:10.1017/err.2017.19
  Article. View on figshare.
• Mendis, D., Nielsen, J., Nicol, D., & Li, P. (2017). The co-existence of copyright and patent laws to protect innovation — a case study of 3D printing in UK and Australian law. In The Oxford handbook of law, regulation, and technology (pp. pages). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199680832.013.80
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• Guadamuz, A. (2017). Do androids dream of electric copyright? Comparative analysis of originality in artificial intelligence generated works. Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2017(2), 169-186.
  Article. View on figshare.
• Li, P., Faulkner, A., Griffin, J., & Medcalf, N. (2017). Mass customisation governance: regulation, liability, and intellectual property of re-distributed manufacturing in 3D bioprinting. IfM, Cambridge.
  Reports and working papers. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2017). Patents, mass innovation and the Xiaokang society. WIPO Journal, 8(1), 97-108.
  Article. View on figshare.
• Lampoltshammer, T. J., Guadamuz, A., Wass, C., & Heistracher, T. (2017). Openlaws.eu. In Advances in Public Policy and Administration (pp. 173-190). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0717-8.ch009
  Chapter. View online.

2016

• Frabboni, M. (2016). France. In Moral Rights, 2nd Edition (pp. 415-454). Sweet and Maxwell.
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• Frabboni, M. (2016). Italy. In Moral Rights, 2nd Edition (pp. 539-560). Sweet and Maxwell.
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• de Rosnay, M. D., & Guadamuz, A. (2017). Memory hole or right to delist? Implications of the right to be forgotten on web archiving. RESET, 6, 1-22. doi:10.4000/reset.807
  Article. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2016). Regulation of bio-3D printing in the UK. In International Symposium of Additive Manufacturing Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2016). Intellectual property of 3D printing. In International Symposium of Additive Manufacturing Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2016). Risk, intellectual property and food labelling. In International Summer School (Food law and policy course). University of East Finland.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Li, P., & Griffin, J. (2016). The necessity of 'privacy justice' in the era of technological regulation. In 35th Annual ATRIP Congress: Intellectual Property as Functional Pluralism: the Parameters, Challenges and Opportunities of Variation. Krakow, Poland.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2016). 3D bioprinting technologies: patents, innovation and access. In Brocher Foundation Workshop. 3D bioprinting: a new medical and ethical frontier?. Geneva.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2016). Towards mass entrepreneurship and innovation: the case of 3D printing in healthcare delivery. In Department of Public Administration Research Seminar. Central South University, Changsha, China.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Guadamuz, A. (2016). The monkey selfie: copyright lessons for originality in photographs and internet jurisdiction. Internet Policy Review, 5(1), pages. doi:10.14763/2016.1.398
  Article. View on figshare.

2015

• Guadamuz, A., & Marsden, C. (2015). Blockchains and Bitcoin: regulatory responses to cryptocurrencies. First Monday, 20(12), 1-46. doi:10.5210/fm.v20i12.6198
  Article. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2015). Medical 3D printing, risk regulation, and intellectual property. In Conference on Innovation and Communications Law. Xiamen, China.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Barnett, S., & Townend, J. (2015). Introduction. In Media Power and Plurality. Springer Nature. doi:10.1057/9781137522849.0005
  Chapter. View online.
• Li, P. (2014). 3D bioprinting technologies: patents, innovation, and access. Law, Innovation and Technology, 6(2), 282-304. doi:10.5235/17579961.6.2.282
  Article. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2015). 3D printing, innovation and intellectual property: two case scenarios. In International Association for the Advancement of Teaching and Research in Intellectual Property 2015 Congress. Cape Town.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Guadamuz, A. (2015). Free and Open Source Software: Policy, Law and Practice. QUEEN MARY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 5(4), 530-531. doi:10.4337/qmjip.2015.04.12
  Article. View online.

2014

• Guadamuz, A. (2014). Development in Internet liability. In Research handbook on EU Internet law (pp. 312-366). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  Chapter. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2014). Inequality and intellectual property: patenting genetic diagnostic methods after Myriad. In Genetics, Genomics and Global Health - Inequalities, Identities and Insecurities, 4th Annual Global Health Conference. University of Sussex.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2014). Regulation of science and technology: a comparative study between ancient and contemporary China. In BILETA 29th Annual Conference. University of East Anglia.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Guadamuz, A., & Cabell, D. (2014). Data mining In UK higher education institutions: law and policy. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 4(1), 3-29. doi:10.4337/qmjip.2014.01.01
  Article. View on figshare.
• Li, P., Mellor, S., Griffin, J., Waelde, C., Hao, L., & Everson, R. (2014). Intellectual property and 3D printing: a case study on 3D chocolate printing. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 9, 322-332. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpt217
  Article. View online.
• Li, P., Mellor, S., Griffin, J., Waelde, C., Hao, L., & Everson, R. (2014). Intellectual property and 3D printing: a case study on 3D chocolate printing. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpt217
  Presentation. View on figshare.

2013

• Li, P. (2014). Health technologies and international intellectual property law: a precautionary approach. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203550663
  Book. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2014). Health technologies and international intellectual property law: a precautionary approach. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203550663
  Book. View online.
• Li, P. (2013). Rights and responsibilities in patents: a precautionary patent framework in WTO law. European Intellectual Property Review, 35(9), 519-526.
  Article. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (2013). The price of life: intellectual property, patents and standards in global health. In Pharmaceuticals and Global Health: Inequalities and Innovation in the 21st Century. University of Sussex Conference Centre Brighton, United Kingdom.
  Presentation. View on figshare.

2012

• Li, P., Mellor, S., Griffin, J., Waelde, C., & Liang, H. (2012). Intellectual property and 3D printing: a case study on 3D chocolate printing. In Bridging the Gaps: The Exeter Science Exchange Workshop - 3D-Printing Workshop: Legal Challenges. Exeter University.
  Presentation. View online.
• Brown, A., & Li, P. (2012). New conversations: the BILETA and Information Technology Think Tank collaborative consultation response programme. European Journal of Technology and Law, 3(1), pages.
  Article. View on figshare.

2010

• Frabboni, M. (2010). Italy. In Moral rights (pp. 461-480). Sweet & Maxwell.
  Chapter. View on figshare.

2006

• Guadamuz, A. (2006). Book Reviews. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 14(2), 252-254. doi:10.1093/ijlit/eal004
  Article. View online.

2004

• Guadamuz, A. (2004). Why SOL?. SCRIPT-ed, 1(1), 3-4. doi:10.2966/scrip.010104.3
  Article. View online.

2002

• Stirling, A., Harremoës, P., Gee, D., MacGarvin, M. M., Keys, J. J., Vaz, S., & Wynne, B. (2002). Conclusions. In The Precautionary Principle in the Twentieth Century: late lessons from early warnings (pp. pages). Earthscan.
  Chapter. View on figshare.

Unpublished works

• Li, P., Brown, A., & Rauhofer, J. (n.d.). Responses to consultations – the BILETA contribution. In British and Irish Legal Education and Technology Association Conference. Manchester Metropolitan University.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (n.d.). IP, precaution and public health. In European Association of Health Law Conference. Royal College of Physicians, Edinburgh.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Li, P., & Lim, P. H. (n.d.). A precautionary approach to compulsory licensing and tempering the data exclusivity obstacle for access to medicines. In British and Irish Legal Education and Technology Association 2013 Annual Conference. University of Liverpool.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Li, P., & Griffin, J. (n.d.). 3D printing and intellectual property research in the UK. In 3D Printing and Intellectual Property Seminar. Central South University, Changsha, China.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Li, P. (n.d.). Mass customisation governance: regulation, liability and intellectual property of re-distributed manufacturing in 3D printing. In Taipei Representative Office in the UK Symposium in Science & Technology Academic Research. Southampton.
  Presentation. View on figshare.
• Lim, P. -H., & Li, P. (n.d.). Patentability of Biofabricated Human Organs: ‘Products of Nature’ or ‘Products Derived from Nature’ Revisited. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4286668
  Preprint. View online.
• Aplin, T. F., Schafer, B., & Li, P. (n.d.). Response to UK IPO Open Consultation on AI and IP: Copyright and Patents. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4003626
  Preprint. View online.
• Morita-Jaeger, M., Li, P., Ropez, J., Perdana, A., & Arfin, S. (n.d.). The UK’s data governance regime and the (challenging) data partnership with Indonesia. Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy (CITP). Retrieved from https://citp.ac.uk/
  Reports and working papers.