Research outputs

The best new writing on Open Science and statistics

Picture of research outputs

Our team of collaborators is at the cutting edge of research and practice in Open Science with a strong track record in publication. Here you can find details of some key publications from our contributors and other influential papers from the field.

Journal Articles

  • Open Science

    Dienes, Z. (forthcoming). The inner workings of Registered Reports. In A. L. Nichols & J. E. Edlund (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods and Statistics for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yhp2a

    Parsons, S., Azevedo, F., Elsherif, M. M., Guay, S., Shahim, O. N., Govaart, G. H., Norris, E., O’Mahony, A., Parker, A. J., Todorovic, A., Pennington, C. R., Garcia-Pelegrin, E., Lazić, A., Robertson, O., Middleton, S. L., Valentini, B., McCuaig, J., Baker, B. J., Collins, E., … Aczel, B. (2022). A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4

    Stewart, S. R., Pennington, C. R., Silva, G. F. A., Ballou, N., Butler, J., Dienes, Z., Jay, C., Rossit, S., & Samara, A. (2021). Reforms to improve reproducibility and quality must be coordinated across the research ecosystem: The view from the UKRN Local Network Leads. BMC Research Notes, 15(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05949-w

    Colling, L. J., & Szűcs, D. (2021). Statistical inference and the replication crisis. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 12, 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0421-4

  • Statistical Methods

    Sladekova, M., Webb, L. E. A., & Field, A. P. (in-press). Estimating the change in meta-analytic effect size estimates after the application of publication bias adjustment methods. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000470

    Lakens, D., Adolfi, F. G., Albers, C. J., Anvari, F., Apps, M. A. J., Argamon, S. E., Baguley, T., Becker, R. B., Benning, S. D., Bradford, D. E., Buchanan, E. M., Caldwell, A. R., Calster, B. V., Carlsson, R., Chen, S.-C., Chung, B., Colling, L. J., Collins, G. S., Crook, Z., … Zwaan, R. A. (2018). Justify your alpha. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0311-x


    Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., Cesarini, D., Chambers, C. D., Clyde, M., Cook, T. D., Boeck, P. D., Dienes, Z., Dreber, A., Easwaran, K., Efferson, C., … Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z

    Field, A. P., & Wilcox, R. R. (2017). Robust statistical methods: A primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.013

  • Bayesian Methods

    Dienes, Z. (2021). How to use and report Bayesian hypothesis tests. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practise, 8(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bua5n

    Dienes, Z. (2021). Obtaining evidence for no effect. Collbra: Psychology, 7(1), Article 28202. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.28202

    Dienes, Z. (2019). How do I know what my theory predicts? Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919876960

    Dienes, Z., & Mclatchie, N. (2018). Four reasons to prefer Bayesian analyses over significance testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1266-z

    Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781

    Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920

  • Multi-Lab Studies

    Colling, L. J., Szűcs, D., Marco, D. D., Cipora, K., Ulrich, R., Nuerk, H.-C., Soltanlou, M., Bryce, D., Chen, S.-C., Schroeder, P. A., Henare, D. T., Chrystall, C. K., Corballis, P. M., Ansari, D., Goffin, C., Sokolowski, H. M., Hancock, P. J. B., Millen, A. E., Langton, S. R. H., … McShane, B. B. (2020). Registered replication report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Sciences, 3(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920903079

    Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Publications as Consultant Statisticians

  • Journal Articles

    Schweizer, S., Satpute, A. B., Atzil, S., Field, A. P., Hitchcock, C., Black, M., Feldman Barrett, L., & Dalgleish, T. (2019). The impact of affective information on working memory: A pair of meta-analytic reviews of behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 145(6), 566–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000193

    Whale, R., Fialho, R., Field, A. P., Campbell, G., Tibble, J., Harrison, N. A., & Rolt, M. (2019). Factor analyses differentiate clinical phenotypes of idiopathic and interferon-alpha-induced depression. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 80, 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2019.04.035

    Ward, J., Field, A. P., & Chin, T. (2019). A meta-analysis of memory ability in synaesthesia. Memory, 27(9), 1299–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1646771

    Cartwright-Hatton, S., Ewing, D., Dash, S., Hughes, Z., Thompson, E. J., Hazell, C., Field, A. P., & Startup, H. (2018). Preventing family transmission of anxiety: Feasibility RCT of a brief intervention for parents. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12177

    Ayers, S., Crawley, R., Button, S., Thornton, A., Field, A. P., Flood, C., Lee, S., Eagle, A., Bradley, R., Moore, D., Gyte, G., & Smith, H. (2018). Evaluation of expressive writing for postpartum health: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-018-9970-3

    Stuijfzand, S., Creswell, C., Field, A. P., Pearcey, S., & Dodd, H. (2018). Is anxiety associated with negative interpretations of ambiguity in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12822

    Crawley, R., Ayers, S., Button, S., Thornton, A., Field, A. P., Lee, S., Eagle, A., Bradley, R., Moore, D., Gyte, G., & Smith, H. (2018). Feasibility and acceptability of expressive writing with postpartum women: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18, 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1703-7

    Flack, Z. M., Field, A. P., & Horst, J. S. (2018). The effects of shared storybook reading on word learning: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 54(7), 1334–1346. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000512

    Brown, T. A., & Field, A. P. (2017). Best practice guidelines for modern statistical methods in applied clinical research: Introduction to the Special Section. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.06.008

Other Key Publications