Sussex Centre for Human Rights Research

Publications

2025

  • Ferreira, N., & Danisi, C. (2025). X, Y and Z (European Union): Who is protected as queer refugee by the Court of Justice of the European Union?. In Queer Judgments (pp. pages). Coventry, UK: Counterpress.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Ferreira, N., Moscati, M., & Raj, S. (2025). Queer(ing) Judgments. In Queer Judgments (pp. pages). Coventry, UK: Counterpress.
    Chapter. View on figshare.

2024

  • Craig, E. (2024). Twenty five years of minority rights monitoring in Ukraine. European Yearbook of Minority Issues, 21, pages.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Ferreira, N., & Bausili, A. V. (2024). Adopting a rights lens to children’s training in football academies. Amicus Curiae, 5(2), 242-259.
    Article. View on figshare.

2023

  • Ferreira, N., Sokhi-Bulley, B., Velluti, S., & Berry, S. (2023). Submission to the UK Parliament’s Human Rights (Joint Committee) ‘Legislative Scrutiny: Illegal Migration Bill’ inquiry. (pp. pages). London: UK Parliament.
    Other. View on figshare.

2022

  • Thorne, B., & Evans, M. (2022). [Blog] The pitfalls and potential of researching and teaching ‘stuff’. LaPSe of Reason: Blogging from the School of Law, Politics and Sociology at the University of Sussex.
    Blog. View on figshare.
  • Craig, E., Berry, S., & Taban-McQuade, I. (2022). Submission to the UN Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues on ‘The Place of the Human Rights of Minorities in the Institutions, Structures and Initiatives of the United Nations’. University of Sussex.
    Reports and working papers. View on figshare.
  • Evans, M. (2022). In, against, and beyond transitional justice. In Beyond transitional justice: transformative justice and the state of the field (or non-field) (pp. 3-10). Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003169451-2
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Evans, M. (2022). Beyond transitional justice: transformative justice and the state of the field (or non-field). Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003169451
    Edited Book. View on figshare.

2021

  • Evans, M. (2021). Land and the limits of liberal legalism: property, transitional justice and non-reformist reforms in post-apartheid South Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 48(170), 646-655. doi:10.1080/03056244.2021.1987209
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Townend, J., & Magrath, P. (2022). Remote trial and error: how COVID-19 changed public access to court proceedings. Journal of Media Law, 13(2), 107-121. doi:10.1080/17577632.2021.1979844
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Baldi, G. (2021). Un-veiling dichotomies: European secularism and women’s veiling. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79297-8
    Book. View on figshare.
  • Danisi, C., Dustin, M., Ferreira, N., & Held, N. (2021). Queering asylum in Europe: legal and social experiences of seeking international protection on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69441-8
    Book. View on figshare.
  • Berry, S., & Taban, I. (2021). The right of minority-refugees to preserve their cultural identity: an intersectional analysis. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 1-22. doi:10.1177/09240519211033419
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Ferreira, N., & Danisi, C. (2021). Queering international refugee law. In The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law (pp. 78-96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Bu, Q. (2021). The global governance on automated facial recognition (AFR): ethical and legal opportunities and privacy challenges. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 2, 113-145. doi:10.1365/s43439-021-00022-x
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Hutton, M. (2021). Children first: putting the rights of children visiting prisons at the heart of policy and practice. In Parental Imprisonment and Children’s Rights (1st ed., pp. 240.0 pages). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315270234
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Evans, M. (2021). Transitional justice, transformative justice, democracy and development. In Research handbook on democracy and development (pp. 359-371). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781788112659.00030
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Ferreira, N. (2021). An exercise in detachment: the Council of Europe and sexual minority asylum claims. In Queer migration and asylum in Europe (pp. 78-108). UCL Press.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Velluti, S. (2021). The “Inside looking out”: mainstreaming human rights in EU external relations. In Human rights as a horizontal issue in EU external policy. les droits de l’homme comme domaine horizontal de la politique extérieure de l’Union européenne (pp. 275-306). Naples, Italy: Editoriale Scientifica.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Craig, E. (2021). The framework convention for the protection of national minorities and internalisation: lessons from the Western Balkans. Review of Central and East European Law, 46(1), 1-40. doi:10.1163/15730352-bja10042
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Woods, L., McNamara, L., & Townend, J. (2021). Executive accountability and national security. Modern Law Review, 84(3), 553-580. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12624
    Article. View on figshare.

2020

  • Edmunds, J. (2021). Precarious bodies: the securitization of the "veiled" woman in European human rights. British Journal of Sociology, 72(2), 315-327. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12806
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Evans, M. (2021). You cannot eat critique: on uncritical critical (legal) theory and the poverty of bullshit. European Journal of Legal Studies, 13(1), 187-222. doi:10.2924/EJLS.2019.036
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Moscati, M. (2020). Negotiating within legal ambiguity: same-sex partners, family disputes and negotiation in Italy. In Comparative dispute resolution (pp. 146-157). Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781786433039
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Velluti, S. (2020). The role of the EU in the promotion of human rights and international labour standards in its external trade relations. Switzerland: Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56748-4
    Book. View on figshare.
  • Skeet, C. (2020). [Review] Patrizia Gentile, Gary Kinsman, and L. Pauline Rankin (eds) We still demand!: Redefining resistance in sex and gender struggles. British Journal of Canadian Studies, 32(1-2), 139-188. doi:10.3828/bjcs.2020.8
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Townend, J. (2020). Positive free speech and public access to courts. In Positive free speech: rationales, methods and implications (pp. 216.0 pages). UK: Hart Publishing.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Danisi, C., & Balboni, M. (2020). Reframing human rights in Russia and China: an international law perspective. In Rekindling the strong state in Russia and China: domestic dynamics and foreign policy projections (Vol. 45, pp. 61-78). Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004428898_005
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Moscati, M. (2020). Dispute resolution, domestic violence and abuse between lesbian partners. In Research handbook on gender, sexuality and the law (pp. 271-285). Edward Elgar.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Paz-Fuchs, A. (2020). Workfare’s persistent philosophical and legal issues: forced labour, reciprocity, and a basic income guarantee. In Welfare to work in contemporary European welfare states: legal, sociological and philosophical perspectives on justice and domination (pp. 364.0 pages). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
    Chapter. View on figshare.

2019

  • Danisi, C. (2019). Crossing borders between international refugee law and international human rights law in the European context: can human rights enhance protection against persecution based on sexual orientation (and beyond)?. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 37(4), 359-378. doi:10.1177/0924051919884758
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Skeet, C. (2019). Forced sterilizations: addressing limitations of international rights adjudication through an intersectional approach. In Women's health and the limits of law: domestic and international perspectives (pp. 322 pages). Abingdon; New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351002387
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Skeet, C. (2020). [Review] Sharon Crozier-De Rosa (2018) Shame and the anti-feminist backlash: Britain, Ireland and Australia, 1890-1920. In Women's History Review (Vol. 29, Iss. 1, pp. 164-165). Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/09612025.2019.1672271
    Other. View on figshare.
  • Guntrip, E. (2019). International investment law, hybrid authority and jurisdiction. In The Oxford handbook of jurisdiction in international law (pp. 431-454). Oxford University Press.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Skeet, C. (2019). Intersectionality as theory and method: human rights adjudication by the European Court of Human Rights. In The Routledge Handbook of socio-legal theory and method (pp. pages). UK: Routledge.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Lee, P. -H. (2019). After the storm, comes a calm? The compromised ‘Asia’s first’ same-sex marriage. 199X Dorm, (2), pages.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Berry, S. (2019). [Review] Jeroen Temperman and András Koltay (2017) Blasphemy and freedom of expression: comparative, theoretical and historical reflections after the Charlie Hebdo massacre. Human Rights Law Review, 19(2), 387-391. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngz006
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Hutton, M. (2019). A labour of love: the lived experience of the parents of prisoners and their role as human rights protectors. In Handbook of prison and the family (pp. 385-405). Palgrave MacMillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12744-2_19
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Lee, P. -H. (2019). The struggle for marriage equality and intimate citizenship: a field occupied by multiple hegemonic discourses. Taiwan Human Rights Journal, 5(1), 173-186.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Skeet, C. (2019). Orientalism in the European Court of Human Rights. Religion and Human Rights, 14(1), 31-63. doi:10.1163/18710328-13021145
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Fouladvand, S. (2019). Corruption and human trafficking: a holistic approach. In Corruption in the global era: causes, sources and forms of manifestation (pp. 289-305). Routledge.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Ferreira, N. (2019). A Roma European crisis road-map: A holistic answer to a complex problem. doi:10.31235/osf.io/t2f7b
    Preprint. View online.
  • Brayson, K. (2019). Of bodies and burkinis: institutional Islamophobia, Islamic dress and the colonial condition. Journal of Law and Society, 46(1), 55-82. doi:10.1111/jols.12142
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Moscati, M. (2019). [Review] Elizabeth Brake and Lucinda Ferguson (2018) Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law. International Journal of Children's Rights, 27(1), 177-192. doi:10.1163/15718182-02701004
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Bohoslavsky, J. P., & Guntrip, E. (2019). Unanticipated consequences: the human rights implications of bringing sovereign debt disputes within investment treaty arbitration. In Yearbook on Investment Law & Policy 2017 (pp. 494-535). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Evans, M. (2019). Contentious politics and contentious scholarship: challenges researching social movements in South Africa. The International Journal of Human Rights, 23(4), 653-678. doi:10.1080/13642987.2018.1562911
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Evans, M. (2019). Transitional and transformative justice: critical and international perspectives. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
    Edited Book. View on figshare.
  • Sanders, A. (2019). The CPS, policy-making and assisted dying: towards a ‘freedom’ approach. In Criminal Law Reform Now Proposals and Critique (pp. 133-154). UK: Bloomsbury. doi:10.5040/9781509916801.ch-005
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Berry, S. (2019). Avoiding scrutiny? The margin of appreciation and religious freedom. In The European Court of Human Rights and the Freedom of Religion or Belief: the 25 years since Kokkinakis (Vol. 13, pp. 103-127). Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004346901_007
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Dustin, M., Millns, S., & Ferreira, N. (2019). Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03122-0
    Edited Book. View on figshare.
  • Berry, S. (2019). The UN Human Rights Committee disagrees with the European Court of Human Rights again: the right to manifest religion by wearing a burqa. European Journal of International Law.
    Blog. View on figshare.

2018

  • Petito, F., Berry, S., & Mancinelli, M. (2018). Interreligious engagement strategies: a policy tool to advance freedom of religion or belief. FORB & Foreign Policy Initiative.
    Reports and working papers. View on figshare.
  • Bosland, J., & Townend, J. (2018). Open justice, transparency and the media: representing the public interest in the physical and virtual courtroom. Communications Law, 23(4), 183-202.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Guntrip, E. (2018). International investment law in an isolationist world: a human rights perspective. Human Rights and International Legal Discourse, 12(2), 138-152.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Danisi, C. (2018). What 'Safe Harbours' are there for sexual orientation and gender identity asylum claims? A human rights reading of international law of the sea and refugee law. GenIUS - Rivista di studi giuridici sull'orientamento sessuale e sull'identita' di genere, 2018(2), 9-24.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Dustin, M., & Held, N. (2018). In or out? A Queer intersectional approach to ‘Particular Social Group’ membership and credibility in SOGI asylum claims in Germany and the UK. GenIUS - Rivista di studi giuridici sull’orientamento sessuale e l’identità di genere, 2018(2), 74-87.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Ferreira, N. (2018). Reforming the Common European Asylum System: enough rainbow for queer asylum seekers?. GenIUS - Rivista di studi giuridici sull’orientamento sessuale e l’identità di genere, 2018(2), 25-42. doi:10.31235/osf.io/xag5u
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Danisi, C. (2018). International protection and SOGI. GenIUS - Rivista di studi giuridici sull'orientamento sessuale e sull'identita' di genere, (2), 103.0 pages.
    Edited Special Journal Issue. View on figshare.
  • O'Sullivan, A., & Fazaeli, R. (2018). Multilateralism, human rights and the 1970s: insights from Ireland's role in the development of the human rights field. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 29, 181-197. doi:10.3318/ISIA.2018.29.13
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Danisi, C., Dustin, M., & Ferreira, N. (2018). [Blog] Brexit, sexual orientation and gender identity: what about the people?. The UK in a Changing Europe.
    Blog. View on figshare.
  • O'Sullivan, A. (2018). A return to stability? Hegemonic and counter-hegemonic positions in the debate on universal jurisdiction in absentia. In Mobilising international law for 'Global Justice' (pp. 163-183). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108586665.008
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Velluti, S. (2018). Articles 145-150 TFEU. In International and European labour law: a commentary (pp. 3-20). Baden Baden; München; Oxford: Nomos/ CH Beck/ Hart Publishing.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Van den Putte, L., & Velluti, S. (2018). The promotion of social trade by the European Union in its external trade relations. In Handbook on the EU and international trade (pp. 224-242). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Berry, S. (2018). Aligning interculturalism with international human rights law: 'Living Together' without assimilation. Human Rights Law Review, 18(3), 441-471. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngy022
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Dustin, M. (2018). Neocolonial agendas and asylum for women and sexual minorities. Sussex Student Law Journal, 2(1), 25-33.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Baldi, G. (2018). Re-conceptualizing equality in the work place: a reading of the latest CJEU’s opinions over the practice of veiling. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 7(2), 296-312. doi:10.1093/ojlr/rwy028
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Evans, M. (2018). Transformative justice: remedying human rights violations beyond transition. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351239462
    Book. View on figshare.
  • Ferreira, N., & Venturi, D. (2018). [Blog] Testing the untestable: The CJEU’s decision in Case C-473/16, F v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal. European Database of Asylum Law.
    Blog. View on figshare.
  • Dustin, M. (2018). Many rivers to cross: the recognition of LGBTQI asylum in the UK. International Journal of Refugee Law, eey018, pages. doi:10.1093/ijrl/eey018
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Baldi, G. (2018). Law & critique: burkini, bikini and the female (un)dressed body. Critical Legal Thinking [weblog article, 22 June 2018], pages.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Bu, Q. (2018). Extraterritorial jurisdiction vis-à-vis sovereignty in tackling transnational counterfeits: between a rock and a hard place. European Intellectual Property Review, 40(6), 381-398.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Danisi, C. (2018). Il principio del preminente interesse del minore in ambito migratorio: verso una convergenza?. In Migrazioni e diritto internazionale: verso il superamento dell'emergenza? (pp. 517-530). Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Lee, P. -H. (2017). Beyond the text: ‘Global’ SOGI rights movement versus ‘International’ human rights law. Taiwan International Law Quarterly, 14(2), 39-70.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Dustin, M. (2018). Op-Ed: sexual orientation, gender identity and asylum in the UK: is ‘discretion’ ever a choice?. ECRE Weekly Bulletin, pages.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Berry, S., & Petito, F. (2018). Interreligious engagement and sustainable peace. The role of interreligious dialogue and collaboration in combatting intolerance and discriminations: mapping internationalinitiatives and best practices. Italian Institute for International Political Studies.
    Reports and working papers. View on figshare.
  • Brayson, K. (2018). From solidarity to precarity: thinking equality post-Brexit. The UK in a Changing Europe [Weblog article, 15 May 2018], pages.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Baldi, G. (2018). Between patriarchy and occupation: violence against women in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. In Reconsidering gender based violence and other forms of violence against women: Comparative analysis in the light of the Istanbul Convention (pp. 247-295). Italy: Libellula University Press.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Baldi, G. (2018). Re-thinking the (legal) limits of the state in the case of Talpis v Italy. In Reconsidering gender based violence and other forms of violence against women: Comparative analysis in the light of the Istanbul Convention (pp. 195-213). Italy: Libellula University Press.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Bjarnadottir, M. (2017). Below the line: free speech, privacy and online publishing at the European Court of Human Rights. Young Human Rights Lawyer Journal, 1(3), 4-6.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Berry, S. (2017). Mainstreaming a minority rights-based approach to refugee and migrant communities in Europe. Minority Rights Group International.
    Reports and working papers. View on figshare.

2017

  • Evans, M., & Wilkins, D. (2019). Transformative justice, reparations and transatlantic slavery. Social & Legal Studies, 28(2), 137-157. doi:10.1177/0964663917746490
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Lee, P. -H. (2017). Taiwan’s participation in international organisations: The World-Health-Assembly model [????????????? ???????]. In The law of living in jianghu: Plain Law Movement [????,????:????????] (pp. pages). Taipei: UNITAS Publishing Co..
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Lee, P. -H. (2017). Against discrimination: The core principle and ultimate goal of international human rights law [???????????????:????]. In The law of living in jianghu: Plain Law Movement [????,????:????????] (pp. pages). Taipei: UNITAS Publishing Co..
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Berry, S. (2017). Democracy and the preservation of minority identity: fragmentation within the European human rights framework. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 24(3), 205-228. doi:10.1163/15718115-02403005
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Love, G., De Michele, G., Giakoumidaki, C., Sánchez, E. H., Lukera, M. F., & Cartei, V. (2017). Improving access to sexual violence support for marginalised individuals: findings from the LGBT and BME communities. Critical and Radical Social Work, 5(2), 163-179. doi:10.1332/204986017X14933954425266
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Baldi, G. (2017). 'Visible others': a reading of the European obsession with the female veil. Sociology and Anthropology, 5(8), 677-687. doi:10.13189/sa.2017.050812
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Berry, S. (2017). Religious freedom and the European Court of Human Rights’ two margins of appreciation. Religion and Human Rights, 12(2-3), 198-209. doi:10.1163/18710328-12231145
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Baldi, G. (2017). 'Burqa avenger': law and religious practices in secular space. Law and Critique, 29(1), 31-56. doi:10.1007/s10978-017-9208-5
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Millns, S. (2017). Gender and constitutionalism in the European Union. In Constitutions and gender (pp. 252-267). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781784716967.00017
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Keating, H. (2017). The role of child support in tackling child poverty. In Wealth and Poverty in Close Personal Relationships: Money Matters (pp. 148-166). doi:10.4324/9781315547589
    Chapter. View online.
  • Millns, S., & Wong, S. (2017). Wealth and poverty in close personal relationships: money matters. London: Routledge.
    Edited Book. View on figshare.
  • Millns, S. (2017). Austerity, solidarity and equality: a European Union perspective on gender and wealth. In Wealth and poverty in close personal relationships: money matters (pp. 74-88). London: Routledge.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • Brayson, K. (2017). Securing the future of the European Court of Human Rights in the face of UK opposition: political compromise and restricted rights. International Human Rights Law Review, 6(1), 53-85. doi:10.1163/22131035-00601001
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Gentili, G., & Elaine, M. (2017). The Supreme Court of Canada's transnational judicial communication on human rights (1982-2014): an empirical assessment. In Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights (pp. 114-152). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
    Chapter. View on figshare.
  • O'Sullivan, A. (2017). Universal jurisdiction in international criminal law: the debate and the battle for hegemony. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315648507
    Book. View on figshare.
  • Guntrip, E. (2017). A sociological perspective on investment arbitrators and human rights. In Challenging human rights disenchantment 50 years on from the ICCPR and ICESCR. University of Sussex.
    Presentation. View on figshare.
  • Drisceoil, V. N. (2017). Law, language and access to justice in Northern Ireland: remedying the great mischief. In Droit, langues et cultures: regards croisés sur les difficultés d'accès à la justice au Royaume-Uni (pp. 87-110). Paris: Éditions Panthéon-Assas.
    Chapter. View on figshare.

2016

  • Bjarnadottir, M. (2016). Does the internet limit human rights protection? The case of revenge porn. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 7(3), 204-215.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Demir, E. (2016). The role of the United Nations women, peace and security agenda in promoting gender justice in post-conflict societies: is the agenda transformative. International Journal of Rule of Law, Transitional Justice and Human Rights, 7(7), 81-91.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Craig, E. (2016). Minority rights, integration and education in the Western Balkans. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 67(4), 453-471.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Baldi, G. (2016). Liberal paradoxes: women’s body, religious expression, and gender equality in a secular age. AG AboutGender, 5(10), 166-185.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Baldi, G. (n.d.). The ‘humanity’ of the secular legal subject’: reading the European Court of Human Rights’ decisions over the practice of veiling. Birmingham Law School - Institute of European Law.
    Reports and working papers. View on figshare.

2015

  • Millns, S. (2015). Making the case for comparative public law. In The method and culture of comparative law: essays in honour of Mark Van Hoecke (pp. 283-300). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
    Chapter. View on figshare.

2013

  • Edmunds, J. (2013). Human rights, Islam and the failure of cosmopolitanism (Vol. 13). SAGE Publications. doi:10.1177/1468796812470796
    Book. View on figshare.
  • Anagnostou, D., & Millns, S. (2013). Special Issue: Gender equality, legal mobilization and feminism in a multi-level European system. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 28(2), pages.
    Edited Special Journal Issue. View on figshare.
  • Anagnostou, D., & Millns, S. (2013). [Editorial] Gender equality, legal mobilization, and feminism in a multilevel European system. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 28(2), 115-131. doi:10.1017/cls.2013.17
    Article. View on figshare.

2009

  • Berry, S. (2009). [Review] Peter Cane, Carolyn Evans and Zoë Robinson (2008) Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context. Religion and Human Rights, 4(1), 71-74. doi:10.1163/187103209X442243
    Article. View on figshare.

Unpublished works

  • Lee, P. -H. (n.d.). Against political circumvention: Taiwan’s innovative approach to internalising international human rights. Law Sense Magazine, (20), 8-11.
    Article. View on figshare.
  • Fouladvand, S. (n.d.). Tackling human trafficking: a tale of two protocols. In 'Roundtable on Modern Slavery' hosted by The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI). The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI).
    Presentation. View on figshare.
  • Guntrip, E. (n.d.). Investment arbitration for debt disputes: undermining human rights compliance?. In Investment Arbitration for Debt Disputes: Undermining Human Rights Compliance?. Columbia University, New York.
    Presentation. View on figshare.