We use some essential cookies to make this website work.
We'd like to set additional cookies to understand how you use our site so we can improve it for everyone. Also, we'd like to serve you some cookies set by other services to show you relevant content.
To register for this seminar with Eventbrite please click here
Abstract:
How does wage risk affect consumption and well-being? We study this question using a two-earner life-cycle model with limited commitment and marital status dynamics. We calibrate our model to the US economy and study the individual-level transmission of shocks into consumption and welfare, highlighting gender asymmetries in the welfare impact of shocks. We find that a standard unitary model would underestimate the welfare cost of wage risk by 33%. In addition, eliminating income tax progressivity through a flat tax has a much stronger welfare effect on women (-9.5%) than on men (-2.2%), which would not be captured by a unitary model.