We use some essential cookies to make this website work.
We'd like to set additional cookies to understand how you use our site so we can improve it for everyone. Also, we'd like to serve you some cookies set by other services to show you relevant content.
To register for this seminar with Eventbrite please click here
Abstract:
Exploiting a quasi-natural experimental setup of the 2016 United States presidential results, which unexpectedly shifted the government's position from being supportive of climate science to being openly sceptical, we show that political leadership's climate science belief significantly diminishes financial markets' perception of firm-level climate regulatory exposure. Further investigation reveals that the climate regulatory channel is the fundamental mechanism through which political leaders sway financial markets' perceptions about the strength of firm-level regulatory exposure. Regarding the implications of the link, we find that the capital market rewards the weakened climate regulatory exposure through higher institutional ownership and valuations.